![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
40. – Heat – Michael Mann – 1995
39. – Toy Story – John Lasseter – 1995
38. – The Incredibles – Brad Bird – 2004
37. – Unforgiven – Clint Eastwood – 1992
36. – Once – John Carney – 2007
45. – There Will Be Blood – Paul Thomas Anderson – 2007
Everyone should know by now that Daniel Day Lewis gives a stunning performance in There Will Be Blood. His turn as a greedy oilman is among the actors best roles and has seen to be believed. Some people may argue that the film is only good for this reason, but I think the direction and filmmaking by P.T. Anderson is so well crafted that the film will be known as a film classic years from now. It may borrow a lot from classics like Citizen Kane and Treasure of the Sierra Madre, but I still consider it a unique film.
44. – Finding Nemo – Andrew Stanton – 2003
Finding Nemo is probably Pixar’s most heartfelt movie. It’s not quite as funny as the other Pixar films, but it makes up for it with a touching story, lovable characters, and some of the most colorful and vibrant animation you’ll ever see. I also have to give mention to Thomas Newman’s wonderful score that is perfect in every situation.
43. – Vertigo – Alfred Hitchcock – 1958
Vertigo ranks among the best of the mystery/thriller genre. The story of mistaken identity and people with obsessions is familiar for fans of Hitchcock, but Vertigo uses these themes more effectively than any of his other films. The story’s twists and turns are expertly crafted and Jimmy Stewart’s performance (arguably the best of his career) is both chilling and relatable.
42. – Bambi – David Hand – 1942
What can be said about Bambi that isn’t already known? It’s one of the greatest films from the early Disney days and is the most emotionally devastating film from the company’s catalog. The animation is still beautiful to this day, and the fact that they got so much story and feeling out of a film with hardly any dialogue is stunning.
41. –
Easily the best movie of 1997 in my eyes (sorry Titanic fans, the Oscars were wrong). Writer/Director Curtis Hanson was able to take James Ellroy's crime novel and create a stunning film noir. The film has a thrilling story full of the plot twists that you'd expect from the genre, and a great ensemble cast that includes Kevin Spacey, Guy Pearce, Russell Crowe, Kim Basinger, and James Cromwell.
First of all, I just want to ask everyone who reads this blog to take time once in awhile to share some thoughts on what I say. This isn't meant as an attack on people for not commenting and I'll only bring it up this once. I'm just asking that some of you take the time occasionally to post a comment on my entries. I don't think you have to be a Livejournal member. As far as I know you can post anonymously and just leave your name. So please, I know there are people who read this page. I just want to say that I welcome comments from anyone whether it's to agree or disagree with something I may say. It would be great to see some discussion going. Also, I appreciate those who have already commented. It’s encouraging and fun to read your thoughts. Thanks.
Second, I want to talk a bit about the focus of my movie reviews. As anyone can probably tell by now, I'm focusing on the aspect movies from an entertainment aspect and not on content. I know there is a fine line when it comes to people's views on what is appropriate content for a person to watch and frankly, I don't want to get into that on my blog. Maybe in the future that's something I'll change, but for now when I discuss movies, I'm sticking to discussing their entertainment value.
I do have a couple of things to recommend for people who want to know if the movies that I mention have questionable content. I think the American MPAA ratings for each movie are sometimes debatable in how accurate they are, but I DO think the descriptions do a good job of describing what you can expect to be in the movie. If it says "pervasive language" and "strong sexual content" than it's safe to expect that there will be a barrage of f-words and some sex scenes. I think people tend to forget that these descriptions are on movie posters and cases and I find it surprising how many people mention to me that they walked out of a certain movie because it had unexpected content.
Also, there are three websites that are good if you want to look further into a movie before seeing it. www.screenit.com and www.kids-in-mind.com are both simple and effective sites that rate content on a scale. For something more in-depth there's www.pluggedinonline.com, which can be overly conservative (they'll often list a kiss as sexual content or words like "fart" as foul language), but hey, it's not like you have to agree with their viewpoints and they do an ok job of explaining content in movies. Just be careful because sometimes they include spoilers (although they do have warnings).
So yeah, I guess that’s all I wanted to discuss for now. I’m going to try to keep up a good pace with new entries from now on and I hope you all enjoy reading my thoughts on movies and games.
Vanilla Sky (2001) ****
I’ve heard mixed thoughts on this movie from various people over the years, ranging from “it’s awesome” to “its pretentious garbage.” After seeing it for myself I think it’s a very good film with a lot of interesting ideas. It isn’t as good as other movies with weird stories like Being John Malkovich or Adaptation, but the story unfolds in a way that isn’t confusing as long as you stay focused and it kept me entertained. Tom Cruise and Penelope Cruz both gave oscar worthy performances but were unfortunately overlooked that year. What keeps the movie from being excellent is an overproduced feeling. I normally think Cameron Crowe is a brilliant filmmaker, but some of the visuals and pacing is a little off here. It’s still a great movie though. It’s definitely not the bad film that critics and people made it out to be.
Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008) ****
As I’ve likely mentioned before, I don’t usually enjoy sexual or crude humor. Surprisingly I actually found Sarah Marshall to be pretty funny and enjoyable. I still didn’t find the cruder jokes very funny, but there are some hilarious scenes throughout the movie that kept me laughing. I found myself getting involved in the story a lot more than I did with Superbad and 40 Year Old Virgin. One final note: After seeing what Jason Segel does with puppets in this movie, I cannot wait to see what he does with the next Muppets movie.
Chicago (2002) ***
I tend to have a love/hate feeling when it comes to musicals. Some like Moulin Rouge and Mary Poppins I absolutely adore, while others I just don’t like at all. Seeing
Bullets Over Broadway (1994) *****
I’ve never seen many Woody Allen films before, so this was definitely new ground for me. I have to say I’m pretty impressed with this one film and if other Woody Allen movies are this good then I have a lot of catching up to do. It’s a screwball comedy that uses the 1930s era of broadway and the mafia to create some brilliant comedic scenes. The writing (always important in this genre) is perfect and each performance is gold. I found Dianne Wiest’s performance in particular to be fascinating. I now think that its one of the most well deserved Oscar wins.
The English Patient (1996) *****
I know that this is one of the more controversial best picture winners (it defeated
The Hours (2002) ****
This was an odd one for me. The quality of the film is undeniable. It has an excellent cast (Nicole Kidman, Meryl Streep, Julianne Moore, Ed Harris), solid writing and direction, and high quality art, cinematography and music. I just found the subject matter so depressing that it kept me from getting into the film. Well made, but not for me.